BIR Chief allowed to testify ‘only on authenticity’ of Corona ITR
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Commissioner Kim Henares on Wednesday took the witness stand to present the Income Tax Returns (ITR) of Chief Justice Renato Corona to the Impeachment Court.
In an earlier interview, Henares said she will bring Corona’s ITRs from 1992 to 2010, as requested by the house prosecutors.
Her appearance on the 6th day of the impeachment trial is in relation to the second Article of Impeachment against the Chief Justice, as follows:
In an earlier interview, Henares said she will bring Corona’s ITRs from 1992 to 2010, as requested by the house prosecutors.
Her appearance on the 6th day of the impeachment trial is in relation to the second Article of Impeachment against the Chief Justice, as follows:
ARTICLE IIThe Impeachment Court allowed Henares to testify “only to authenticate” Corona’s ITR.
RESPONDENT COMMITTED CULPABLE VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND/OR BETRAYED THE PUBLIC TRUST WHEN HE FAILED TO DISCLOSE TO THE PUBLIC HIS STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND NET WORTH AS REQUIRED UNDER SEC. 17, ART. XI OF THE 1987 CONSTITUTION.
2.1. It is provided for in Art. XI, Section 17 of the 1987 Constitution that “a public officer or employee shall, upon assumption of office and as often thereafter as may be required by law, submit a declaration under oath of his assets, liabilities, and net worth. In the case of the President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Cabinet, and other constitutional offices, and officers of the armed forces with general or flag rank, the declaration shall be disclosed to the public in the manner provided by law. ”
2.2. Respondent failed to disclose to the public his statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth as required by the Constitution.
2.3. It is also reported that some of the properties of Respondent are not included in his declaration of his assets, liabilities, and net worth, in violation of the anti-graft and corrupt practices act.
2.4. Respondent is likewise suspected and accused of having accumulated ill-gotten wealth, acquiring assets of high values and keeping bank accounts with huge deposits. It has been reported that Respondent has, among others, a 300-sq. meter apartment in a posh Mega World Property development at the Fort in Taguig. Has he reported this, as he is constitutionally-required under Art. XI, Sec. 17 of the Constitution in his Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN)? Is this acquisition sustained and duly supported by his income as a public official? Since his assumption as Associate and subsequently, Chief Justice, has he complied with this duty of public disclosure?
